Regulated decisions

AI answers that can face an auditor.

For healthcare, finance, legal and public-sector work, Qriton keeps sources, uncertainty, model state and human approval together, and refuses to answer when the evidence is not there.

Contested decisions need their evidence.

General assistants answer confidently even when the evidence is missing, and patient, client and case files cannot be sent to someone else’s cloud.

Under the EU AI Act, high-risk systems will need logging, transparency and human oversight that can be shown, not just described.

What changes.

Cited or refused

Only what your approved sources support reaches a decision.

Human approval

Cases above your thresholds go to a named reviewer.

Sealed record

Sources, reasoning, reviewer and outcome, verifiable later.

How it works.

01

Ground

Qriton KB answers only from your approved sources, with citations.

02

Assess

Qriton HLM attaches its own uncertainty to each answer.

03

Review

Consequential or uncertain cases go to a person for approval.

04

Seal

The exchange is sealed in a receipt your auditors can check.

Questions.

Does Qriton make the decision?
No. It supplies cited evidence, uncertainty and a record to the accountable person. Decisions stay with your people.
Does this make us EU AI Act compliant?
Qriton supports the evidence your obligations require. Compliance depends on how the whole system is designed, deployed and governed.
Can it run without internet access?
Yes. KB and HLM can run fully locally, including on isolated networks.

Bring us the decision that has to be right.

BriefingPilot on your dataProduction